Skip to main content

Table 1 Distribution of the seven required graphic health warnings in purchased packs and street-collected packs

From: Distribution of new graphic warning labels: Are tobacco companies following regulations?

Theme of the graphic warning

A priori assessment of the images

Purchased packs (collected October 2008)

Street-collected packs* (collected November 2008 to January 2009)

  

Observed (N)

Percentage

Odds**

Observed (N)

Percentage

Odds**

Corpse with toe-tag

Least disturbing

43

25.6%

Reference category

215

17.8%

Reference category

Pregnant woman & infant

Moderately disturbing

25

14.9%

0.58

(0.36, 0.95)

169

14.0%

0.79

(0.64, 0.96)

Damaged heart

Moderately disturbing

36

21.4%

0.84

(0.54, 1.3)

158

13.1%

0.73

(0.6, 0.9)

Damaged lungs

Moderately disturbing

17

10.1%

0.40

(0.23, 0.69)

174

14.4%

0.81

(0.66, 0.99)

Gangrenous toes

Most disturbing

17

10.1%

0.40

(0.23, 0.69)

156

12.9%

0.73

(0.59, 0.89)

Eye (blindness)

Most disturbing

18

10.7%

0.42

(0.24, 0.73)

169

14.0%

0.79

(0.64, 0.96)

Diseased mouth/cancer

Most disturbing

12

7.1%

0.28

(0.15, 0.53)

167

13.8%

0.78

(0.63, 0.95)

Total

 

168

  

1208

  
  1. * For those packs that had the seven required GHWs (ie, excluding NZ packs with text-only warnings (n = 8), overseas made packs (n = 42), and also NZ packs showing the next batch of seven GHWs that began to appear in January 2009 (n = 52).
  2. ** This column presents the odds of being the specified image rather than the least disturbing image (ie, odds < 1 indicate that the image was less common than the "corpse with toe-tag" image).