|
Ary et al.
|
Experimental – two condition: multigrade level (6th through 11th) social influence prevention, standard care; also parent messages randomly assigned to 12 schools within program condition
|
Yes
|
|
Aveyard et al.
|
Experimental – two condition: expert system and three class sessions based on transtheoretical model, standard health education (a little to motivate quitting)
|
No
|
|
Baskerville, Hotte, Dunkley
|
Quasi-experimental – quit-and-win contest and smoke free month, standard care control
|
Yes
|
|
Bauman et al.
|
Experimental – family program, standard care control
|
No
|
|
Beaglehole et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – classroom program, standard care control
|
No
|
|
Biener et al.
|
Single-group – random digit dialing
|
No
|
|
Chakravorty
|
Experimental – three condition: mintsnuff, chewing gum control, lecture only
|
Yes
|
|
Charlton
|
Quasi-experimental – pilot clinic ("courses"), self-help
|
Yes
|
|
Cinnomin, Sussman
|
Experimental – two condition: social influence/stress-coping, chemical addiction
|
Yes
|
|
Colby et al.
|
Experimental – two condition: motivational interview, brief advice
|
Yes
|
|
Coleman-Wallace et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – three condition: Tobacco Education Program (TEG) for precontemplators, Tobacco Awareness Program (TAP) for those who want to quit, control; 57% mandatory-punish (in TEG)
|
Yes
|
|
Corby et al.
|
Single-group – within subject replicated ABA design, 1 week each with a two week follow-up
|
Yes
|
|
Digiusto
|
Quasi-experimental – three condition: lunchtime quit clinic, class-time quit clinic, standard care control
|
Yes
|
|
Dino et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: not on tobacco (NOT), brief intervention
|
Yes
|
|
Eakin, Severson, Glasgow
|
Single-group – within subject replicated AB design
|
Yes
|
|
Etter, Ronchi, Perneger
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: smoke-free program-four buildings/limited areas/cessation counseling service, control (other buildings)
|
No
|
|
Fibkins
|
Single-group – 1 group clinic
|
No
|
|
Forster et al.
|
Experimental – two condition: policy program, standard care control
|
No
|
|
Glasgow et al.
|
Experimental – two condition: brief intervention, simple advice to quit smoking
|
Yes
|
|
Glover
|
Single-group – two pilot clinics
|
Yes
|
|
Goldberg, Gorn
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: personal involvement, standard care control
|
No, did use behavioral observation
|
|
Greenberg, Deputat
|
Quasi-experimental – four condition: fear, facts, values, standard care control
|
No
|
|
Hafstad, Aaro, Langmark
|
Single-group – mass media campaign for teens
|
No
|
|
Horn et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: not on tobacco (NOT), brief intervention
|
Yes
|
|
Horswell, Horton
|
Quasi-experimental – peer led school clinic, standard care control
|
No
|
|
Hotte et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – quit 4 life small groups plus kit, quit 4 life self-help kit-only
|
No
|
|
Hurt et al.
|
Single-group – nicotine patch therapy
|
Yes
|
|
Jason, Mollica, Ferrone
|
Quasi-experimental – 3 condition: role-play plus discussion, discussion-only, control
|
Yes
|
|
Jerome
|
Single-group – Life Sign computer assisted
|
Yes
|
|
Johnson et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – 4 condition: social curriculum/familiar media role models, social curriculum/unfamiliar media role models, health curriculum/familiar media role models, health curriculum/unfamiliar media role models
|
Yes
|
|
Kempf, Stanley
|
Quasi-experimental – 2 condition: smoke-free policy, standard care control
|
No
|
|
Killen et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – 2 condition: special intervention, standard care control
|
Yes
|
|
Lampkin
|
Single-group – pretest-posttest (averaged follow-up)
|
No
|
|
Librett
|
Single-group – pretest-posttest
|
No
|
|
Lotecka, McWhinney
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: matched groups: coping, information
|
No
|
|
Matson-Koffman, Miller
|
Single-group – quit and win/tobacco free teens, school clinic
|
NR
|
|
McDonald, Roberts, Deeschaemaker
|
Single-group – consecutive cohorts
|
No
|
|
Mills, Ewy, Dizon
|
Single-group – two cohorts, senior high and junior high
|
No
|
|
Murray, Prokhorov, Harty
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: statewide anti-smoking campaign in Minnesota, Wisconsin as control; sequential 9th grade cohorts
|
No
|
|
Myers, Brown
|
Single-group – consecutive cohorts
|
No
|
|
Myers, Brown, Kelly
|
Single-group – consecutive cohorts at three facilities
|
Yes
|
|
Pallonen
|
Single-group – feasibility study
|
Yes
|
|
Patten et al.
|
Single-group – retrospective cohort study
|
Yes, at baseline only
|
|
Patterson
|
Single-group – feasibility study
|
No
|
|
Pendell
|
Single-group – consecutive cohorts
|
No
|
|
Perry et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: special intervention, standard care control
|
Yes
|
|
Perry et al.
|
Experimental – three condition: long-term health effects, social consequences, physiological effects; also two teaching modalities (teacher, college student)
|
Yes
|
|
Peters
|
Single-group – quit 4 life self-help kit requesters
|
No
|
|
Peterson, Clark
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: discussion group, standard care control group
|
No
|
|
Popham et al.
|
Single-group – state-wide: looks at those exposed and not exposed to campaign
|
No
|
|
Prince
|
Quasi-experimental – three condition: peer led, adult led, standard care control group
|
No
|
|
Quinlan, McCaul
|
Experimental – three condition: stage-matched (to precontemplation stages of change), stage-mismatched (action material offered), assessment only
|
No
|
|
Rigotti et al.
|
Quasi-experimental – two condition: enforcement or non-enforcement of tobacco sales laws
|
No
|
|
Skjoldebrand, Gahnberg
|
Single-group – all teens who came to the clinic for check-ups
|
No
|
|
Smith et al.
|
Single-group – non-randomized open label trial
|
Yes
|
|
St. Pierre, Shute, Jaycox
|
Single-group-group clinic pilot of ACS I-Quit
|
No
|
|
Suedfeld et al.
|
Experimental – four condition: use of sensory deprivation (Senory D) chamber or not, with a tobacco use health consequences message or not
|
No
|
|
Sussman, Burton et al.
|
Experimental – three condition: psychosocial dependency, chemical addiction, wait list control
|
Yes
|
|
Sussman, Dent, Lichtman
|
Experimental – three condition: clinic plus school-as-community, clinic only, standard care control
|
Yes
|
|
Sussman, Dent, Stacy
|
Experimental – three condition: health educator led classroom, self-instruction, standard care control
|
Yes
|
|
Townsend et al.
|
Single-group – "1-shot"
|
No
|
|
Vartiainen et al.
|
Single-group-quit-and win approach
|
Yes
|
|
Wakefield et al.
|
Nation-wide survey of the extent of smoking restrictions on teen smoking
|
No
|
|
Weisman et al.
|
Single-group-AB design
|
Yes
|
|
Zavela, Harrison, Owens
|
Experimental – three condition: mint snuff, bubble gum, comparison (no oral substitute lecture-only group)
|
No
|
|
Zheng
|
Single-group – quit clinic pilot
|
Yes
|
