Table 5 Cessation studies – recruitment

Ary et al.

1. classroom prevention program

Aveyard et al.

1. use of whole classes as part of personal health and social education lessons

Baskerville, Hotte, Dunkley

1. contest

2. home room class announcement

Bauman et al.

1. telephone screening

Beaglehole et al.

1. classroom education program

Biener et al.

1. telephone screening based on random-digit-dialing

Chakravorty

1. person-to-person

2. PA announcement

3. flyer

Charlton

1. class presentation

Cinnomin, Sussman

1. class presentation

2. person-to-person

Colby et al.

1. patient assessment (screening) and information about project

2. money ($20)

Coleman-Wallace et al.

1. school district support and announcements

2. money ($3) for control group

3. mandatory to avoid suspension (57% subjects)

Corby et al.

1. newspaper ads

2. money ($135 total possible)

3. referrals from community agencies

4. person-to-person

Digiusto

1. posters

2. assembly announcement

3. classroom announcement

4. class release time in 1 condition

Dino et al.

1. poster "ads" placed in likely smoking areas and public areas around the school

2. PA announcement

3. person-to-person

4. class release time

Eakin, Severson, Glasgow

1. person-to-person

2. referrals

3. money ($60)

Etter, Ronchi, Perneger

1. names of university administrative files (screening)

2. surveys by mail

Fibkins

1. person-to-person

2. referrals to school counselor and nurse

Forster et al.

1. classroom surveys (whole classes)

2. media campaigns

3. policy enactment and enforcement

Glasgow et al.

1. chart review/screening (approach subject at contraceptive visit)

2. money ($70)

Glover

1. mandatory

Goldberg, Gorn

1. mandatory

Greenberg, Deputat

1. person-to-person

2. referrals

3. 2 unit credit for complete participation

4. mandatory

5. principal support

Hafstad, Aaro, Langmark

1. county-wide mass media campaign

2. home-mailed questionnaire, with three reminders

Horn et al.

1. poster "ads" placed in likely smoking areas and public areas around the school

2. PA announcement

3. person-to-person

4. class release time

Horswell, Horton

NR

Hotte et al.

1. class credit

2. some type of school-wide announcements

Hurt et al.

1. flyers in schools

2. press releases, TV and radio announcements,

3. telephone interview/screening

4. $100 compensation

Jason, Mollica, Ferrone

1. classroom program

Jerome

1. person-to-person

2. referral by assistant principal

Johnson et al.

1. classroom program

Kempf, Stanley

In-patient facility – NA

Killen et al.

1. classroom program

Lampkin

1. screened at school health center

2. provider referral

3. clinical interview

4. $2500 offered to participating sites

Librett

1. posters

2. flyers

3. PA announcements

4. person-to-person

5. mandatory at 1 of 5 schools

Lotecka, McWinney

1. person-to-person

2. class release time

Matson-Koffman, Miller

1. contest with prizes

McDonald, Roberts, Deeschaemaker

1. posters

2. mandatory tobacco classes

Mills, Ewy, Dizon

1. mandatory to avoid disciplinary action

2. school referral

Murray, Prokhorov, Harty

1. state-wide campaign; 90% school participation, 95% of youth heard or saw at least 1 TV or radio ad

2. funds available for programs – $0.50 per student

Myers, Brown

In-patient facility – NA

Myers, Brown, Kelly

1. announcements at outpatient facilities

2. intake interview/screening, child and parent

Pallonen

NR – vocational high school students

Patten

1. sometimes flyers in schools

2. sometimes press releases, TV and radio announcements

3. for Nicotine Dependence Center consultation

Patterson

NR

Pendell

NR

Perry et al.

1. classroom program

Perry et al.

1. classroom program

Peters

1. widely advertised through TV and print media

2. free to any teen who reported smoking at least 18 months

Peterson, Clark

1. classroom presentation

Popham et al.

1. state-wide campaign; 50% of youth heard or saw at least 1 TV or radio ad

2. youth contacted through school districts

Prince

1. PA announcements

2. person-to-person

3. referrals

Quinlan and McCaul

1. screening questionnaire

2. ad in university newspaper

3. posters

4. extra credit or $10–15

5. person-to-person

6. lottery ($100)

Rigotti et al.

1. written information sent from health departments

2. minor sting operation

Skjoldbrand, Gahnberg

All youth who were seen at the clinic for check-ups, NA

Smith et al.

1. flyers

2. press releases

3. referrals

4. money ($50)

St. Pierre, Shute, Jaycox

NR

Suedfeld et al.

1. college newspaper advertisement

2. screening of smokers, blind to study

Sussman, Burton et al.

1. flyers

2. PA announcements

3. person-to-person

4. class release time

Sussman, Dent, Lichtman

1. classroom presentation

2. elective class credit

3. person-to-person

4. class release time

5. flyers

Sussman, Dent, Stacy

1. classroom program

2. class credit

Townsend et al.

1. voluntary – invitation

Vartiainen et al.

1. campaign letter sent to schools

2. youth fill out registration cards

3. two prizes of ~$800 at 1-month, 2 prizes of~$1,600 at 6-months

Wakefield et al.

1. contacted school districts

2. voluntary survey; strong restrictions: 57% public places, 48% home, 91% school

Weissman et al.

1. person-to-person

2. voluntary – invitation

Zavela, Harrison, Owens

1. flyers

2. PA announcements

3. ads in college newspapers

4. referrals

5. money ($20)

Zheng

1. school staff announcements at two schools

2. money ($10)