Skip to main content

Table 1 Predictors of support for a non-earmarked increase in tobacco tax in Greece, October 2010

From: Tobacco taxation: the importance of earmarking the revenue to health care and tobacco control

  

Adjusted1

Crude

Variable

aOR

95% C.I

p- Value

OR

95% CI

p- Value

Socioeconomic status

0.68

0.37 - 1.25

0.211

0.71

0.42 - 1.21

0.205

Age

0.69

0.47 - 1.01

0.059

0.61

0.43 - 0.85

0.003

Gender

1.17

0.83 - 1.66

0.366

1.15

0.85- 1.56

0.373

Current Smoking status

0.12

0.08 - 0.17

<0.001

0.14

0.09- 0.19

<0.001

Residence

0.89

0.60 - 1.31

0.560

0.94

0.67- 1.33

0.741

  1. 1: Logistic regression model adjusted for age (≤ 34 years vs. >34 years*), SES (High vs. other*), gender (male* vs. female), residence (urban* vs. rural), current smoking status (current smoker vs. otherwise*). Asterisks (*) indicate reference groups.
Back to article page

Tobacco Induced Diseases

ISSN: 1617-9625

Contact us