Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of outcomes for mental illness participants who used 16 mg nicotine e-cigarettes, 0 mg e-cigarettes and 21 mg nicotine patches

From: E-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking reduction or cessation in people with mental illness: secondary analysis of data from the ASCEND trial

Outcome

21 mg nicotine patch (n = 35, 40%)

16 mg nicotine e-cigarette (n = 39, 45%)

0 mg nicotine e-cigarette (n =12, 14%)

Difference (p-value)

Biochemically verified continuous abstinence at six months % (n)

14% (5)

5% (2)

0

0.245 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)a

- (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

0.115 (patch vs. combined e-cig)a

Relapse rate at six months % (n)

71% (25)

85% (33)

83% (10)

0.169 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)

1.000 (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

0.149 (patch vs. combined e-cig)

Mean reduction in CPD from baseline to six months in those that did not quit Mean (SD)

5.7 (6.3)

9.9 (7)

4.7 (3.5)

0.035 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)

0.068 (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

0.083 (patch vs. combined e-cig

Percentage reduction in CPD from baseline to six months in those that did not quit Mean (SD)

29% (30%)

49% (30%)

31% (30%)

0.025 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)

0.153 (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

0.049 (patch vs. combined e-cig)

Treatment compliance at three months % (n)

20% (6)

53% (19)

46% (5)

0.006 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)

0.670 (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

0.006 (patch vs. combined e-cig)

Adverse events

17 (in 16 people)

22 (in 15 people)

5 (in 4 people)

-

Acceptability of intervention at six months

‘Would recommend to a friend’ % (n)

37% (11)

83% (30)

80% (8)

<0.001 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)

1.000a (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

<0.001 (patch vs. combined e-cig)

‘Stopped as didn’t like it’ % (n)

41% (12/29)

29% (7/24)

22% (2/9)

0.356 (patch vs. 16 mg e-cig)

1.000a (16 mg vs. 0 mg e-cig)

0.242 (patch vs. combined e-cig)

  1. CPD = cigarettes per day smoked, SD = standard deviation, aFishers Exact test.