Acculturation, Depression, and Smoking Cessation: a trajectory pattern recognition approach

Table 1 Differences in intervention attributes among three identified patterns

Intervention Attributes^a	Culturally Adapted	N = 50	More Bicultural	N = 32	Less Bicultural	N = 15
	M	SE^b	M	SE²	M	SE²
Included in MI-Fuzzy
Perceived benefit at 1-M F/U***	133.56	1.88	135.41	2.33	112.91	5.67
Perceived benefit at 3-M F/U	128.72	3.05	125.19	4.72	113.21	4.06
Perceived benefit at 6-M F/U**	129.23	2.30	135.05	2.23	115.00	4.32
Perceived benefit at 12-M F/U***	129.50	3.16	135.65	2.65	113.79	4.98
Perceived family norm at 1-M F/U***	5.63	0.14	5.57	0.10	3.91	0.31
Perceived family norm at 3-M F/U***	5.59	0.09	5.57	0.11	4.21	0.28
Perceived family norm at 6-M F/U***	5.36	0.14	5.45	0.11	4.08	0.30
Perceived family norm a4 12-M F/U***	5.14	0.16	5.43	0.12	3.79	0.24
Excluded
Perceived risk at 1-M F/U**	56.00	2.16	53.07	2.70	72.50	6.50
Perceived risk at 3-M F/U*	64.46	2.26	54.48	2.34	75.13	4.87
Perceived risk at 6-M F/U	64.61	2.84	67.76	3.15	77.71	5.15
Perceived risk at 12-M F/U	63.10	2.75	68.43	3.09	80.40	4.65
Perceived peer norm at 1-M F/U	3.72	0.33	3.93	0.42	2.42	0.82
Perceived peer norm at 3-M F/U*	3.70	0.38	4.48	0.32	1.93	0.64
Perceived peer norm at 6-M F/U	3.68	0.34	4.14	0.39	2.29	0.47
Perceived peer norm at 12-M F/U	4.00	0.32	3.57	0.53	1.73	0.73
Self-efficacy at 1-M F/U***	40.94	1.01	40.41	1.16	32.58	2.00
Self-efficacy at 3-M F/U	37.54	1.31	39.43	1.54	34.60	1.99
Self-efficacy at 6-M F/U	38.34	1.70	35.68	1.61	31.93	2.05
Self-efficacy at 12-M F/U	36.90	1.44	34.74	1.98	29.40	2.38

^aMissingness ranges from 9%–18% for intervention attributes
^bFor multiple imputation, the means and standard errors were computed based on ten imputed data sets (Robin, 1996; Shafer, 1997)
M Month, F/U follow-up
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001

ISSN: 1617-9625