Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of smoking prevalence (%; 95% confidence interval) by ascertainment method and site, CRONICAS Study, Peru, 2010

From: Low cigarette smoking prevalence in peri-urban Peru: results from a population-based study of tobacco use by self-report and urine cotinine

Occasional smoking

Lima

(n=195)

Tumbes

(n=187)

Total

(n=382)

Self-Report

10.3 (6.0, 14.5)

7.5 (3.7, 11.3)

8.9 (6.1, 11.8)

Creatinine-Adjusted Cotinine (10–100 mcg/mg)

0.5 (−0.5, 1.5)

2.1 (0.1, 4.2)

1.3 (0.2, 2.4)

Difference by method

9.7 (5.4, 14.1)

5.3 (1.0, 9.7)

7.6 (4.5, 10.7)

Daily smoking

Lima

(n=195)

Tumbes

(n=187)

Total

(n=382)

Self-Report

3.1 (0.7, 5.5)

6.4 (2.9, 9.9)

4.7 (2.6, 6.8)

Creatinine-Adjusted Cotinine (≥100 mcg/mg)

2.1 (0.1, 4.0)

9.1 (5.0, 13.2)

5.5 (3.2, 7.8)

Difference by method

1.0 (−2.1, 4.2)

−2.7 (−8.1, 2.7)

−0.8 (−3.9, 2.3)

  1. Bold indicates significance at p = 0.05. Differences estimated by t-tests