Open Access

The effects of Secondhand Smoke (SHS) exposure on microvascular endothelial function among healthy women

  • Zulkefli Sanip1,
  • Siti Hajar Mohd Hanaffi2,
  • Imran Ahmad2,
  • Siti Suhaila Mohd Yusoff2,
  • Aida Hanum Ghulam Rasool3 and
  • Harmy Mohamed Yusoff2, 4Email author
Tobacco Induced Diseases201513:32

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-015-0052-9

Received: 28 August 2014

Accepted: 20 August 2015

Published: 3 September 2015

Abstract

Background

Studies have demonstrated that secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure could impair endothelial function. However, the effect of SHS exposure specifically on microvascular endothelial function is not well understood. This study aimed to determine the effects of SHS exposure on microvascular endothelial function among non-smoking, generally healthy women.

Findings

We studied 127 women; and based on their hair nicotine levels measured using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, 25 of them were categorized as having higher hair nicotine levels, 25 were grouped as having lower hair nicotine and 77 women were grouped into the non-detected group. The non-detected group did not have detectable levels of hair nicotine. Anthropometry, blood pressure (BP), lipid profile and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured accordingly. Microvascular endothelial function was assessed non-invasively using laser Doppler fluximetry and the process of iontophoresis involving acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside as endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilators respectively. The mean hair nicotine levels for higher and lower hair nicotine groups were 0.74 (1.04) and 0.05 (0.01) ng/mg respectively. There were no significant differences in anthropometry, BP, lipid profile and hsCRP between these groups. There were also no significant differences in the microvascular perfusion and endothelial function between these groups.

Conclusion

In this study, generally healthy non-smoking women who have higher, lower and non-detected hair nicotine levels did not show significant differences in their microvascular endothelial function. Low levels of SHS exposure among generally healthy non-smoking women may not significantly impair their microvascular endothelial function.

Background

Endothelial dysfunction is one of the earliest vascular changes that occur in the pathogenesis of many cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [1] including the development of atherosclerosis [2]. Reversibility of endothelial dysfunction has been demonstrated with various pharmacological interventions such as statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), and metformin [35]. Microcirculation is said to be the initial site of endothelial damage for women who are at risk of CVD [6]. Therefore, the assessment of microvascular endothelial function can be utilized as a tool to detect early vascular changes [7] that may occur due to medical conditions and diseases, or to monitor the response to pharmacological interventions.

According to the Surgeon General’s report in 2010, the exposure to SHS leads to a rapid and sharp increase of endothelial dysfunction and inflammations, which are implicated in acute cardiovascular events and thrombosis [8]. There were fast accumulating evidences of cardiovascular related parameters which include platelet and endothelial function, arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis, inflammation, oxidative stress, heart rate variability, energy metabolism, and increased infarct size, being delicately responsive to the toxins in SHS [9]. Early studies have showed that cigarette smoke contains lipophilic substances that are toxic to bovine arterial endothelial cells [10], and can directly damage the integrity of the endothelial cell layer in man and reduce vasodilator properties in vitro [11]. Therefore, we hypothesized that there may be differences in microvascular endothelial function among generally healthy non-smoking women who were exposed and non-exposed to SHS. Women with detectable levels of hair nicotine were further divided in those with higher and lower levels of high nicotine; differences in microvascular endothelial function between the three groups were studied.

Methods

Subjects

SHS is defined as combination of side-stream cigarette smoke (the smoke given off from a burning tobacco product) and the exhaled mainstream smoke [12]. In this comparative cross-sectional study, we divided the subjects into three groups based on their hair nicotine levels; which were groups with higher hair nicotine levels (n = 25), lower hair nicotine levels (n = 25) and non-detected group (n = 77). The number of subjects in higher and lower hair nicotine groups were divided equally based on their hair nicotine rank. All subjects were generally healthy with serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels below 5.0 mmol/l, non-smokers, normotensive, non-diabetic (fasting blood sugar (FBS) below 6.1 mmol/l), not on routine medications, and possess no history of acute or chronic diseases such as CVD, renal, liver, haematological diseases, or active psychiatric conditions. The study protocol has been approved by Research Ethics Committee (Human) of Universiti Sains Malaysia and all subjects have signed the informed consent before any procedures were performed. Subjects were required to refrain from consuming any beverages containing caffeine and salty meal starting a day before the test and fast for at least 10 h before the vascular examination.

Anthropometry, blood pressure, blood analysis and hair nicotine levels

Body weight and height were measured using a digital weighing scale attached with stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of weight (kg) to height (m2) (kg/m2). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were measured on the right arm in sitting position using a digital blood pressure monitor (MX3, Omron, Japan) after at least 10 min of resting. Two readings were taken with 5 min apart and the mean reading was recorded. Fasting venous blood was taken for lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] and hsCRP measurement. Hair samples were obtained for hair nicotine level analysis as described in previous study [13]. The hair samples were cut as close as possible to the scalp and only 10 cm (maximum length) of hair samples (measured from the scalp end) were used for hair nicotine analysis. Generally, the procedures for hair nicotine analysis involve hair washing, digestion, extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS) analysis while the limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.04 ng/mg.

Assessment of microvascular endothelial function

The microvascular endothelial function was assessed non-invasively using laser Doppler fluximetry (LDF) and iontophoresis process; where the procedures and reproducibility had been reported previously [14, 15]. Iontophoresis is a method of delivering ionic drugs into the skin by applying low voltage to a drug solution. The local cutaneous forearm skin perfusion was measured by Dual-channel DRT4 LDF with DP1T-V2 skin laser probe (Moor Instruments, Axminster, United Kingdom) and permit real-time continuous measurement of microvascular perfusion. Iontophoresis of freshly prepared of 1 % ACh (Fluka Chemie Gmbh, Japan) and 0.9 % SNP (Riedel-de Haen, C.O.O. Switzerland) in sodium chloride (Excel Pharmaceutical, Selangor, Malaysia) were used to assess endothelial dependent vasodilatation and endothelial independent vasodilatation respectively.

Vascular measurements were conducted in the morning in a quiet room with a constant temperature. The subjects lie down in a supine position with the right forearm uncovered. Two iontophoresis chambers for 400 μL of ACh and SNP solutions were used simultaneously and the laser probes were fixed into the chambers. Two minutes of baseline perfusion were recorded before the measurement. ACh and SNP induced vasodilatation were quantified using these parameters; maximum change in perfusion (max), percent change in perfusion (percentage change), peak flux (peak), and area under the curve (AUC) as defined previously [14]. The blood perfusion was recorded as flux and expressed using arbitrary unit (AU). Intraday and interday coefficient of variations in this study for AChmax was 11.6 and 12.5 % respectively.

Data was presented in terms of mean and standard deviation (SD). Mean comparison of anthropometry (weight, BMI), blood pressure (SBP, DBP), lipid profile (TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C), hsCRP and hair nicotine levels between higher, lower and non-detected groups were performed using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). p value of less than 0.05 was denoted as significant.

Results

The mean hair nicotine levels for higher and lower hair nicotine groups were 0.74 and 0.05 (0.01) ng/mg respectively. The levels of hair nicotine in higher hair nicotine group were significantly different with lower and non-detected hair nicotine groups. Table 1 showed no significant differences in the anthropometry, blood pressure, lipid profile and hsCRP between higher, lower and non-detected hair nicotine groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in microvascular endothelial-dependent and endothelial-independent vasodilatations parameters (Table 1).
Table 1

Anthropometry, blood pressure, lipid profile, hsCRP and microvascular endothelial function of the three study groups

Parameters

Higher Hair Nicotine (n = 25)

Lower Hair Nicotine (n = 25)

Non-Detected (n = 77)

F stat. (df)

p Value

Hair Nicotine (ng/mg)

0.74 (1.04)

0.05 (0.01)

-

25.255 (2124)

0.000

Age (years)

33.92 (8.47)

31.92 (6.56)

35.01 (7.90)

1.512 (2124)

0.225

Weight (kg)

62.64 (12.05)

56.06 (14.36)

58.68 (11.12)

1.931 (2124)

0.149

BMI (kg/m2)

26.11 (4.68)

24.13 (4.94)

24.28 (4.10)

1.833 (2124)

0.164

SBP (mmHg)

116.10 (11.83)

111.08 (10.88)

113.14 (13.18)

1.026 (2124)

0.361

DBP (mmHg)

72.25 (7.19)

70.62 (8.00)

72.29 (9.20)

0.374 (2124)

0.689

Total Cholesterol (mmol/l)

5.25 (0.75)

5.57 (1.11)

5.47 (0.86)

0.833 (2124)

0.437

Triglyceride (mmol/l)

0.96 (0.29)

1.04 (0.37)

1.08 (0.48)

0.685 (2124)

0.506

LDL-C (mmol/l)

3.32 (0.83)

3.39 (0.84)

3.20 (0.87)

0.499 (2124)

0.608

HDL-C (mmol/l)

1.59 (0.28)

1.69 (0.47)

1.77 (0.38)

2.179 (2124)

0.117

hsCRP (mg/ml)

1.97 (3.23)

1.26 (2.55)

1.14 (2.07)

1.105 (2123)

0.334

AChmax (AU)

44.42 (35.94)

58.73 (38.23)

41.00 (33.98)

2.398 (2124)

0.095

ACh Percent Change (%)

747.20 (519.81)

1163.91 (733.11)

824.42 (702.49)

2.934 (2124)

0.057

ACh Peak Flux (AU)

50.99 (37.33)

64.29 (39.38)

47.00 (35.52)

2.106 (2124)

0.126

Area Under Curve (AU x sec)

23683.29 (18330.72)

32733.11 (23516.35)

22831.67 (20934.55)

2.156 (2124)

0.120

SNPmax (AU)

56.69 (47.03)

71.57 (55.49)

54.61 (42.12)

1.306 (2124)

0.275

SNP Percent Change (%)

1212.80 (1107.81)

1453.16 (1110.19)

983.66 (680.17)

2.910 (2124)

0.058

SNP Peak Flux (AU)

62.08 (47.39)

77.11 (55.82)

61.71 (44.03)

1.057 (2124)

0.350

Area Under Curve (AU x sec)

32132.01 (27630.41)

35238.12 (27681.69)

30502.01 (25708.12)

0.305 (2124)

0.738

Data presented as Mean (SD)

One-way ANOVA

BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, LDL-C low density lipoprotein-cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, hsCRP high sensitivity c reactive protein, ACh max acetylcholine absolute change, SNP max sodium nitroprusside absolute change

Discussion

In the present study, there were no significant differences between the three groups for all parameters including microvascular endothelial function.

The endothelium plays a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular tone as well as in the maintenance of vascular integrity. In this respect, nitric oxide (NO) formed by endothelial cells is a crucial importance because it exerts a number of potential protective actions, including vasorelaxation and antithrombotic effects. A condition in which an impaired NO-mediated relaxation is associated with preserved vasodilation to an NO donor is often referred as endothelial dysfunction [16]. In the present study, we focused on the functional aspects of human peripheral microcirculation and studied its responses to ACh and SNP in the forearm skin among women exposed to SHS. However, exposure to SHS showed no significant differences in the responses of local microcirculation of both ACh and SNP.

It had been reported that acute high dose of SHS exposure for one hour did not damage the microvascular endothelial function among healthy non-smoker women [17]. Contrary, other findings showed significant reduction of skin blood flow reactivity, indicates the deterioration of peripheral microvascular endothelial function [18, 19]. We could not find a report on the effects of chronic SHS exposure to microvascular endothelial function. However, the effect of chronic SHS to endothelial function of larger blood vessels has been reported. A study reported that brachial-artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was dose-dependently damaged in women with a history of SHS exposure for more than one hour daily for more than 3 years in comparison with the controls [20]. Another study stated that, healthy women who are exposed to SHS for more than 1 h daily for more than 10 years showed significant impairment of ACh-induced epicardial coronary artery dilatation, indicating endothelial dysfunction may occur diffusely to the subjects exposed to SHS [21].

The explanation for the lack of impairment of microvascular endothelial function in the current study remains unclear. Our study was designed to evaluate the effects of chronic exposure to SHS on microvascular endothelial function among healthy women. The intensity of exposure to SHS depends on a large number of variables, such as the exposure time per day, the proximity to the active smokers, the number of active smokers at home or workplace, and the size and ventilation of the rooms where SHS exposure occurs. One possibility to explain the lack of impairment of microvascular endothelial function in the current study may relate to the time of exposure. Our subjects may be exposed to SHS for short periods of time; subjects in previous studies which showed impairment of endothelial function in larger blood vessels were exposed to SHS for at least one hour per day [20, 21]. Another possibility is, most of our subjects were housewives, and the only active smokers were their husbands. Generally, they were not exposed to SHS while their husbands are at work and their main daily activities were also limited to house chores and close neighbourhood. The SHS exposure that they have might not be adequate to cause significant impairment in their microvascular endothelial function.

The heterogeneity of microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells in respond to SHS exposure could be another reason why there were no significant changes in microvascular endothelial function in this study. Microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells have been reported to show different responses to certain medical conditions or interventions. For example, coronary endothelial cells reacted with a decreased secretion of tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) and increase plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) activity to incubate with oxidized LDL-C, although there was only a minor response by the cardiac microvascular endothelial cells [22]. Besides, different microvascular and macrovascular responses with different stimulation have been demonstrated previously [23]. Macrovascular and microvascular perfusion increased significantly using induced hyperaemia at upper and lower arm. However, passive leg raising only changed the macrovascular indices significantly but not the microvascular indices. Moreover, among rheumatoid arthritis patients, there were no association observed between microvascular and macrovascular endothelial-dependent and independent functions [24], suggesting that microvascular and macrovascular have different regulations of their endothelial function.

Hair nicotine levels of SHS group in our study were comparatively lower compared to a few other previous studies [14, 25]. This may indicate that the exposure to cigarette smoke in our SHS subjects was relatively low which may contribute to the insignificant effect on microvascular endothelial function. An area that could be studied in the future includes the investigation on women who have heavier exposure to SHS, and confirming this exposure using objective measurement such as hair nicotine levels.

In this study, there were no significant differences in microvascular endothelial function between generally health non-smoking women with higher, lower and non-detected hair nicotine levels. The lack of microvascular endothelial function impairment in this study may be due to insufficient exposure to SHS. The reduction of endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of the skin microvasculature may become visible after many years of exposure, or when exposed to high intensity of SHS.

Abbreviations

SHS: 

Secondhand smoke

GCMS: 

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

LDF: 

Laser Doppler fluximetry

ACh: 

Acetylcholine

SNP: 

Sodium nitroprusside

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for providing USM Research University (RU) Grant (1001/PPSP/812088) to conduct this study and our gratitude also goes to staff at the National Poison Centre and Department of Family Medicine for their assistance during this study.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Central Research Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
(2)
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
(3)
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
(4)
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, City Campus

References

  1. Abularrage CJ, Sidawy AN, Aidinian G, Singh N, Weiswasser JM, Arora S. Evaluation of the microcirculation in vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42:574–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shimokawa H. Primary endothelial dysfunction: atherosclerosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:23–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hornig B, Landmesser U, Kohler C, Ahlersmann D, Spiekermann S, Christoph A, et al. Comparative effect of ace inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism on bioavailability of nitric oxide in patients with coronary artery disease: role of superoxide dismutase. Circulation. 2001;103:799–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Masumoto A, Hirooka Y, Hironaga K, Eshima K, Setoguchi S, Egashira K, et al. Effect of pravastatin on endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease (cholesterol-independent effect of pravastatin). Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:1291–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mather KJ, Verma S, Anderson TJ. Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1344–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brodsky SV, Zhang F, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Endothelium-derived microparticles impair endothelial function in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H1910–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Damaske A, Muxel S, Fasola F, Radmacher MC, Schaefer S, Jabs A, et al. Peripheral hemorheological and vascular correlates of coronary blood flow. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011;49:261–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease, A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2010.Google Scholar
  9. Barnoya J, Glantz SA. Cardiovascular effects of secondhand smoke: nearly as large as smoking. Circulation. 2005;111:2684–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Xu CB, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Stavenow L. Interactions between cultured bovine arterial endothelial and smooth muscle cells: effects of injury on the release of growth stimulating and growth inhibiting substances. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;69:195–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang JY, Cao YX, Xu CB, Edvinsson L. Lipid-soluble smoke particles damage endothelial cells and reduce endothelium-dependent dilatation in rat and man. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2006;6:3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ministry of Health Malaysia. Clinical practice guidelines on treatment of tobacco use and dependence. 2003. p. 1–39.Google Scholar
  13. Man CN, Ismail S, Harn GL, Lajis R, Awang R. Determination of hair nicotine by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009;877:339–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Al-Tahami BA, Yvonne-Tee GB, Halim AS, Ismail AA, Rasool AHG. Reproducibility of Laser Doppler fluximetry and the process of iontophoresis in assessing microvascular endothelial function using low current strength. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2010;32:181–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Al-Tahami BA, Yvonne-Tee GB, Halim AS, Ismail AA, Rasool AHG. Method optimization on the process of iontophoresis with laser Doppler fluximetry in the assessment of microvascular endothelial function. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2011;7:35–40.Google Scholar
  16. Celermajer DS. Endothelial dysfunction: does it matter? is it reversible? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:325–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bard RL, Dvonch JT, Kaciroti N, Lustig SA, Brook RD. Is acute high-dose secondhand smoke exposure always harmful to microvascular function in healthy adults? Prev Cardiol. 2010;13:175–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bonetti PO, Lardi E, Geissmann C, Kuhn MU, Brüesch H, Reinhart WH. Effect of brief secondhand smoke exposure on endothelial function and circulating markers of inflammation. Atherosclerosis. 2011;215:218–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Argacha JF, Adamopoulos D, Gujic M, Fontaine D, Amyai N, Berkenboom G, et al. Acute effects of passive smoking on peripheral vascular function. Hypertension. 2008;51:1506–211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Celermajer DS, Adam MR, Clarkson P, Robinson J, McCredie R, Donald A, et al. Passive smoking and impaired endothelium-dependent arterial dilatation in healthy young adults. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:150–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sumida H, Watanabe H, Kugiyama K, Ohgushi M, Matsumura T, Yasue H. Does passive smoking impair endothelium-dependent coronary artery dilatation in women? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:811–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gräfe M, Auch-Schwelk W, Hertel H, Terbeek D, Steinheider G, Loebe M, et al. Human cardiac microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells respond differently to oxidatively modified LDL. Atherosclerosis. 1998;137:87–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bapat M, Musikantow D, Khmara K, Chokshi P, Khanna N, Galligan S, et al. Comparison of passive leg raising and hyperemia on macrovascular and microvascular responses. Microvasc Res. 2013;86:30–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandoo A, Carrol D, Metsios GS, Kitas GD, van Zanten JJCS V. The association between microvascular and macrovascular endothelial function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R99.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim S, Wipfli H, Navas-Acien A, Dominici F, Avila-Tang E, Onicescu G, et al. Determinants of hair nicotine concentrations in nonsmoking women and children: a multicountry study of secondhand smoke exposure in homes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:3407–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sanip et al. 2015

Advertisement