Open Access

Tobacco Xenobiotics Release Nitric Oxide

Tobacco Induced Diseases20031:207

https://doi.org/10.1186/1617-9625-1-3-207

Published: 15 September 2003

Abstract

Many xenobiotic compounds exert their actions through the release of free radicals and related oxidants [1, 2], bringing about unwanted biological effects [3]. Indeed, oxidative events may play a significant role in tobacco toxicity from cigarette smoke. Here, we demonstrate the direct in vitro release of the free radical nitric oxide (NO) from extracts and components of smokeless tobacco, including nicotine, nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(methyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in phosphate buffered saline and human saliva using electron spin resonance and chemiluminescence detection. Our findings suggest that tobacco xenobiotics represent as yet unrecognized sources of NO in the body.

Introduction

Whether generated intracellularly, or exogenously delivered, the diatomic free radical nitric oxide (NO) is rapidly disseminated throughout the body, affecting key biological processes. Supra-physiologic NO concentrations favor the formation of a potent biological oxidant; peroxynitrite (ONOO-), the reaction product of NO and the oxygen-centered free radical, superoxide, O2•- [4]. Numerous cytotoxic lesions have been attributed to ONOO-, including lipid peroxidation, protein thiol oxidation, inhibition of Fe-S enzyme systems, and oxidative DNA lesions such as strand breaks and base modifications, to name some [46].

Of the over 30 carcinogens found in tobacco, the nitrosamine compounds, nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) are thought to be the major contributors to the carcinogenic activity of nicotine and tobacco [7, 8]. NNN and NNK are formed during the curing, aging, and fermentation of tobacco, as well as during nicotine metabolism. Already, NO generation has been demonstrated in cigarette smoke [9]. The structural similarities between NNN and NNK, and other known therapeutic and experimental NO-releasing compounds suggest that these nitrosamines may be novel NO-releasing agents in tobacco [10, 11]. Indeed, NNK has been shown to generate DNA strand breaks, as well as induce the formation of DNA adducts, including methylated DNA [12, 13].

Here, we demonstrate, using both direct and indirect methods, the in vitro release of NO from extracts and components of smokeless tobacco, including nicotine, and the nitrosamine metabolites of tobacco, nitrosonornicotine (NNN) and 4-(methyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK).

Materials and methods

Tobacco xenobiotic preparations

Experiments were conducted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 7.4 or unstimulated human saliva obtained from healthy, non-users of tobacco, without clinical evidence of periodontal disease. We estimated the mass of a "pinch" of smokeless tobacco to be approximately 2.2 g, and suspended this (Copenhagen® brand, National Tobacco Co., Ltd., Pointe Claire, QB) in 4.4 mL of PBS or saliva. The amount of nicotine in this preparation has been determined previously to be 12 ± 0.7 mg per g tobacco [8]. Therefore, 26.4 mg of nicotine (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO) was used for the assays. Ten mg of NNN and NNK (Midwest Research Institute, St. Louis, MO) was used for NO determinations. Each of these prepared solutions was purged with argon gas, and incubated at 37°C for 20 min in an air-tight container before being assayed for NO.

EPR spin trapping

Each xenobiotic preparation was incubated with a 10 mM solution of the iron (II)/N-methyl-D-glucamine dithiocarbamate, Fe2+(MGD)2, spin trap at 37°C for 20 min so that the final concentration of the spin trap was 1 mM [14]. Each 500 μL solution was then quickly transferred to an argon-purged flat cell, and EPR spectra were collected with a Bruker (Billerica, MA, USA) X-band EMX spectrometer operating at 9.75 GHz, receiver gain of 2 × 104, modulation amplitude of 1 G, sweep time of 83 s, and a field center of 3418 G for NO-Fe2+(MGD)2. Each spectrum represents the signal-averaged sum of 15 acquisitions.

Chemiluminescent detection

Fifty μL of each xenobiotic solution was injected into a Sievers 280 Nitric Oxide Analyzer (Boulder, CO, USA) containing a reducing agent, KI, potassium iodide (5.9 mM) in glacial acetic acid [14]. Standardization was accomplished by injecting various concentrations of a standard solution of NaNO2 into the same reducing environment. Samples were run in triplicate.

Results and Discussion

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spin trapping was used to identify NO release from tobacco xenobiotics. The EPR-silent NO spin trap iron (II)/N-methyl-D-glucamine dithiocarbamate, Fe2+(MGD)2, coordinates the free NO radical in aqueous solution, forming a stable, EPR-visible spin adduct, NO-Fe2+(MGD)2. This species yields a characteristic three-line EPR spectrum with an inter-peak hyperfine splitting value, aN, of 12.4 G and an isotropic nuclear g value, giso, of 2.04, both of which are characteristic of trapped NO [14] (Figure 1). We observed unstimulated NO release from smokeless tobacco extract and NNN, and weak release from NNK in PBS. Free NO was not detected from pure nicotine under these conditions. However, given its chemical structure, we would not expect to observe an EPR signal from nicotine. When these experiments were performed in human saliva under identical conditions, we observed substantially stronger EPR signals. We believe this increased signal strength to be derived, in part, from the reduction of salivary NO2- by cytochrome cd1 nitrite reductase found in some salivary bacteria [15, 16]. Under these conditions, we observed a substantial EPR signal from nicotine in human saliva. The intensity of this signal suggests there to be substantial biotransformation of nicotine, facilitating the release of NO. These results suggest that nicotine-derived NO may substantially contribute to the systemic NO load to an extent not previously recognized.
Figure 1

EPR spectra of the NO-Fe(MGD) 2 spin adduct formed from the release of NO from tobacco xenobiotics in phosphate buffered-saline at pH 7.4 (left column) and human saliva (right column). The hyperfine splitting value, aN, of these spectra is 12.4 G and the isotropic nuclear g value, giso, is 2.04. (a) 500 μL phosphate buffered saline (left column) or whole human saliva (right column); (b) 500 μL of a 1:1 w/v extract of smokeless tobacco; (c) 3.48 M (26.7 μG) nicotine; (d) 1.1 M (10 mg) nitrosonornicotine (NNN); and (e) 1.0 M (10 mg) 4-(methyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK). Each spectrum represents 15 summed signal acquisitions acquired using a receiver gain of 2 × 104 and modulation amplitude of 1 G. The ordinate scale is ± 1 × 103 arbitrary units for all spectra in whole human saliva.

As EPR is only semi-quantifiable, we used a chemiluminescence technique to determine NO concentrations derived from smokeless tobacco xenobiotics. This technique, however, detects only the end-product of NO oxidation, namely NO2-. The use of this technique together with EPR spin trapping is considered complementary [14]. The results of these experiments are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, phosphate buffered saline and human saliva generate 5 ± 1 μM and 38 ± 17 μM NO, respectively, while extracts of smokeless tobacco in these fluids produced 1100 ± 50 μM NO (2.53 ± 0.10 mmol NO/g ST) and 1380 ± 80 μM (2.76 ± 0.16 mmol NO/g ST), respectively. The similarity of these results may reflect the high inherent NO2- content of processed smokeless tobacco [5]. We were unable to detect NO from nicotine, NNN and NNK in PBS; the concentrations of NNN- and NNK-derived NO were likely below the detection threshold of the technique (0.2 μM). When nicotine, NNN and NNK were incubated in human saliva, we detected micromolar (or nanomole quantities per milligram xenobiotic) of NO: 150 μM ± 12 from nicotine (2.81 ± 0.23 nmol/mg nicotine), 121 ± 6 μM from NNN (5.90 ± 0.30 nmol/mg NNN) and 113 ± 5 μM from NNK (5.45 ± 0.25 nmol/mg NNK), respectively. As nicotine and the nitrosamine metabolites are found in milligram and microgram quantities per gram of smokeless tobacco, the putative NO load derived from these compounds is substantial. Moreover, the importance of saliva in NO release from these compounds is notable.
Table 1

Chemiluminescent detection of NO

 

Total NO observed

 

in PBS (pH 7.4)

in human saliva

PBS

5 ± 1 μMa

-

Whole human saliva (WHS)

-

38 ± 17 μMa

Smokeless tobacco (ST)

1100 ± 50 μMa

2.53 ± 0.10 μmol/g ST

1380 ± 80 μMa

2.76 ± 0.16 μmol/g ST

Nicotine

< 0.02 μMb

150 ± 12 μMa

2.81 ± 0.23 nmol/mg nicotine

Nitrosonornicotine (NNN)

< 0.02 μMb

121 ± 6 μMa

.90 ± 0.30 nmol/mg NNN

4-(Methyl-N-nitrosamino)-1-(3- pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)

< 0.02 μMb

113 ± 5 μMa

5.45 ± 0.25 nmol/mg NNK

aThis is the apparent concentration of NO present as NO2- in the aqueous incubation injected into the Sievers NOA analyzer.

bThe limit of detection with our experimental conditions.

Although others have reported free radical, and in particular, O2•- production in cells exposed to smokeless tobacco and nicotine [1719], none identified free radical release directly from smokeless tobacco xenobiotics. Tobacco xenobiotics represent as yet unrecognized sources of NO in the body. Indeed tobacco-derived NO may have widespread biological implications for tobacco users. Our results also lead us to speculate that NO and nitrosative events may play a role in tobacco toxicity in the oral cavity and aerodigestive tract.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research to E.W.N.L., and the National Cancer Institute to G.R.B.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
(2)
Free Radical & Radiation Biology Graduate Program and Electron Spin Resonance Facility, The University of Iowa College of Medicine

References

  1. Aust SD, Chignell CF, Bray TM, Kalyanaraman B, Mason RP: Free radicals in toxicology. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1993, 120: 168-178. 10.1006/taap.1993.1100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kulkarni AP: Role of biotransformation in conceptal toxicity of drugs and other chemicals. Curr Pharm Des. 2001, 7: 833-857. 10.2174/1381612013397735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Eiserich JP, Patel RP, O'Donnell VB: Pathophysiology of nitric oxide and related species: free radical reactions and modification of biomolecules. Mol Aspects Med. 1998, 19: 221-357. 10.1016/S0098-2997(99)00002-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckman JS, Koppenol WH: Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly. Am J Physiol. 1996, 271: C1424-1437.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Quijano C, Alvarez B, Gatti RM, Augusto O, Radi R: Pathways of peroxynitrite oxidation of thiol groups. Biochem J. 1997, 322: 167-73.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burney S, Caulfield JL, Niles JC, Wishnok JS, Tannenbaum SR: The chemistry of DNA damage from nitric oxide and peroxynitrite. Mutat Res. 1999, 424: 37-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hecht SS, Rivenson A, Braley J, DiBello J, Adams JD, Hoffmann D: Induction of oral cavity tumors in F344 rats by tobacco-specific nitrosamines and snuff. Cancer Res. 1986, 46: 4162-4166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoffmann D, Djordjevic MV: Chemical composition and carcinogenicity of smokeless tobacco. Adv Dent Res. 1997, 11: 322-329. 10.1177/08959374970110030301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tokimoto T, Shinagawa K: Nitric oxide generation in aqueous solutions of cigarette smoke and approaches its origin. Biol Chem. 2001, 1613-1619. 10.1515/BC.2001.196.Google Scholar
  10. Feelisch M, Ostrowski J, Noack E: On the mechanism of NO release from sydnonimines. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989, 14: S13-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Malo-Ranta U, Yla-Herttuala S, Metsa-Ketela T, Jaakkola O, Moilanen E, Vuorinen P, Nikkari T: Nitric oxide donor GEA 3162 inhibits endothelial cell-mediated oxidation of low density lipoprotein. FEBS Letts. 1994, 337: 179-83. 10.1016/0014-5793(94)80269-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu Y, Sundqvist K, Belinksy SA, Castonguay A, Tjälve H, Grafström RC: Metabolism and macromolecular interaction of the tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone in cultured explants and epithelial cells of human buccal mucosa. Carcinogenesis. 1993, 14: 2383-2388. 10.1093/carcin/14.11.2383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jorquera R, Castonguay A, Schuller HM: DNA single-strand breaks and toxicity induced by 4-(methyl-nitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone or N-nitrosodimethylamine in hamster and rat liver. Carcinogenesis. 1994, 15: 389-394. 10.1093/carcin/15.2.389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Venkataraman S, Martin SM, Schafer FQ, Buettner GR: Detailed methods for the quantification of nitric oxide in aqueous solutions using either an oxygen monitor or EPR. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000, 29: 580-585. 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00404-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan C, Dougall H, Johnston P, Green S, Brogan R, Leifert C, Smith L, Golden M, Benjamin N: Chemical generation of nitric oxide in the mouth from the enterosalivary circulation of dietary nitrate. Nature Med. 1995, 1: 1546-1551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Calmels S, Ohshima H, Henry Y, Bartsch H: Characterization of bacterial cytochrome cd1-nitrite reductase as one enzyme responsible for the catalysis of nitrosation of secondary amines. Carcinogenesis. 1996, 17: 533-536. 10.1093/carcin/17.3.533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bagchi M, Balmoori J, Bagchi D, Stohs SJ, Chakrabarti J, Das DK: Role of reactive oxygen species in the development of cytotoxicity with various forms of chewing tobacco and pan masala. Toxicology. 2002, 179: 247-255. 10.1016/S0300-483X(02)00357-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wetscher GJ, Bagchi D, Perdikis G, Bagchi M, Redmond EJ, Hinder PR, Glaser K, Hinder RA: In vitro free radical production in rat esophageal mucosa induced by nicotine. Dig Dis Sci. 1995, 40: 853-858. 10.1007/BF02064991.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Bagchi M, Balmoori J, Bagchi D, Ray SD, Kuszynski C, Stohs SJ: Smokeless tobacco, oxidative stress, apoptosis, and antioxidants in human oral keratinocytes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999, 26: 992-1000. 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00286-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lam et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement