Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Tobacco Induced Diseases

Open Access

A neglected opportunity for China’s tobacco control? Shift in smoking behavior during and after wives’ pregnancy

Tobacco Induced Diseases201614:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-016-0105-8

Received: 24 July 2016

Accepted: 5 December 2016

Published: 9 December 2016

Abstract

Background

Although observational data suggest that men’s attempts and behavior at quitting smoking are often stimulated during their spouses’ pregnancy, few studies have systematically examined this phenomenon.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study which examined Chinese men’s smoking behaviors during and after their wives’ pregnancy. Women who visited community health centers for routine immunization of their children were approached. Information was mainly collected on men’s tobacco use before, during and after pregnancy in July to August 2011. Individual and socio-environmental factors were examined by non-conditional logistical regression analysis to find potential reasons behind men’s quitting during pregnancy and maintained this change till the post-partum period.

Results

Totally 765 of 811 eligible women (94.3%) completed the interview. Prior to pregnancy, 42.9% of husbands smoked; this decreased to 36.34% during pregnancy, a reduction of 6.53%. Although the rate increased to a higher level (43.79%) after delivery, positive changes in men’s smoking behavior were detected. One-third (29.88%) reduced the daily number of cigarettes smoked, and nearly half (45.12%) relocated themselves to smoke when their pregnant wives were nearby. Noticeably, those who quit were most likely occasional smokers (Odds Ratio(OR) = 4.83, 95%CI [2.22, 10.48]), smoking less than ten years (OR = 2.80, 95%CI [1.19, 6.58]), not smoking at home (OR = 4.48, 95%CI [1.94, 10.39]), not smoking for social use (OR = 4.05, 95%CI [1.74, 9.41]), under lower financial pressure after the birth of child (OR = 5.28, 95%CI [2.14, 13.02]) and influenced by family members (OR = 2.82, 95%CI [1.25, 6.38]). However, only 22% of spontaneous cessation was maintained postpartum. Most relapses occurred within 6 months after delivery.

Conclusions

Pregnancy offers an opportunity to decrease smoking amongst Chinese males. Intervention programs involving expectant fathers may be effective to further reduce prevalence of smoking among men in China.

Keywords

Smoking cessationBehavioral medicinePregnancyChina

Background

Tobacco use has been recognized as a major cause of premature death for more than 50 years. Each year, over 5 million deaths are attributed to tobacco use worldwide and over 1 million occur in China [1]. The number will double by 2030 unless current trends are curbed through effective intervention strategies [2].

The benefits of quitting smoking increase over time, with significant reductions in the risk of numerous adverse health outcomes [3]. In 2008, The World Health Organization (WHO) highlighted the MPOWER strategy (in brief: monitor use, protect people, offer help, warn dangers, enforce bans and raise taxes) aiming to end the global tobacco epidemic [4]. Cessation assistance is one of the key strategies for bringing the anti-tobacco war to the ultimate stage. However, quitting is not yet normative in China [5]. According to the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) China, 2010, the quitting ratio in ever daily smokers was 12.8% — the second lowest amongst all GATS countries [6]. In 2010, China’s ever smokers had a 33.1% relapse rate, similar to that in 2002 and 1996. Three out of four smokers (75.6%) had no plan to quit smoking and the main reason for thinking about quitting smoking was concern for personal health (55.0%) [7]. These findings suggest that, in the past decade, little improvement has been realized since the majority of smokers would not quit until they were faced with a health problem. Thus, there is an urgent need for better outcomes in China’s tobacco control.

Experts suggest that pregnancy offers a teachable moment in which male partners may be particularly receptive to cessation messages [8]. A moderate decrease (3–5%) in smoking prevalence amongst male smokers during their partners’ pregnancy was reported in Norway [9]. Several studies conducted in Asia-Pacific regions also found a significant decrease [5]. However, similar decreases were not observed in other European countries and the North American region, indicating the potential influence of cultural differences which calls for further investigation [10, 11].

Spontaneous quitting has been observed in young men during their wives’ pregnancy in the United States [12]. Several studies have acknowledged that pregnancy can motivate smoking husbands to quit [1315]. A systematic review showed that, regardless of the various quitting ratios across studies, men’s attempts at quitting smoking were often stimulated during their spouses’ pregnancy [16]. In addition to cessation, improvements have been observed in fathers’ smoking patterns. Many smoked outside the room to avoid exposing the mother and the infant to second-hand smoke. Pregnancy and delivery also offered an opportunity for men to strengthen social responsibility for their family’s health status. Each year, China witnesses more than 16 million newborns [17] suggesting that the benefits could be considerable if practical action was taken to encourage expectant fathers to quit smoking during this critical period.

Nonetheless, very limited information is available in China on this topic. One study in Guangzhou documented that some husbands did spontaneously quit smoking when their wives were pregnant [18]. Yet in this research, quitting was defined as not smoking in the past 7 days, which excluded possibility of relapse. Our previous study on exposures to Environment Tobacco Smoke (ETS) in China’s new mothers revealed that 10.7% of smoking husbands reported quitting smoking during their wives’ pregnancy [19]. These findings were comparable to some intervention effects, but no further information was collected to study the reasons behind the cessation success. Neither were data collected to assess whether cessation was sustained after delivery. Thus, the objective of the current study was to understand the extent to which men quit smoking during and after their wife’s pregnancy; to determine the associated factors; and to assess whether cessation was sustained after delivery in terms of cumulative prevalence of relapse.

Method

Participants

Five community health centers in two districts of Shanghai were purposively selected to represent both urban and suburban populations. During July to August 2011, all mothers with children aged 3–18 months who came to the community health center for childhood vaccinations under the national immunization program were asked by the doctor or nurse on site to participate in this study. It was assumed that 38% of the male smokers might quit smoking or reduce tobacco consumption, and the no response rate of the participating women was 10%, thus, the sample size was estimated as 718 (652 + 66). According to the annual report of Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Prevention and Control, the national immunization program had a nearly full coverage (100%) in Shanghai suggesting good representativeness [20]. Women who had been living with a husband/partner in Shanghai for at least one year before the last pregnancy, and also living together during pregnancy and at least three months after were eligible for participation regardless of having a valid Shanghai residence identity.

Procedure and survey content

Eligible mothers were asked to complete a self-administrated anonymous questionnaire after their child’s vaccinations were completed. Trained medical students were on site for assistance. The questionnaire included not only questions regarding socio-demographics; women’s own smoking status and that of their husbands and extended family members; ETS exposure at home; requests made to husband/partner to stop smoking in their presence; knowledge and attitude about smoking and second hand smoke; but also men’s tobacco smoking and quitting during pregnancy; counselling receiving. Counselling refers to education on harms of tobacco towards the pregnant women and husbands which was but not limited to counselling from doctors, midwives and other health professionals.

For those with a husband who smoked, additional information regarding the husband’s quitting behavior during and after the pregnancy was collected. This information included, but was not limited to alterations in numbers and locations of smoking, and factors the mother believed were related to these alterations. Additionally, Women who reported that their husband quit smoking during their pregnancy were asked to report whether a relapse had happened after delivery and the duration between delivery and relapse. In the context of Chinese culture, men living with their female partners in this study were called “husband” regardless of marital status.

We hypothesized that both individual and socio-environmental factors could contribute to expectant fathers’ quitting smoking during pregnancy. Therefore, we listed individual reasons such as age, education, income and current or ever smoker; and socio-environmental reasons such as influences from family members, working environment, social context and living pressure.

Definition of measures

Ever smokers were persons who smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime. Current smokers were ever smokers who were smoking at the time of the survey. Smoking status was classified as daily smokers or occasional smokers. Daily smokers were further classified as light, moderate or heavy smokers for less than 10, 10–20 and more than 20 cigarettes smoked per day respectively, in accordance with the definition used in GATS China 2010 and 2002 National Surveys [6, 21]. Occasional smokers were defined as persons who were currently smoking some days during a week. Quitting smoking was defined as smokers who had not smoked for at least three months.

Environmental factors were assessed with the following items: “My husband quit smoking because he cannot stand the price of cigarettes”, “My husband quit smoking because we discourage his smoking including persuading him not to smoke, setting non-smoking rules at home or asking him to smoke in other places away from me”; “My husband cannot quit smoking because he needs to use cigarettes as a means for social interactions”, “My husband cannot quit smoking because he needs to use cigarettes as a relief for the enhanced financial pressure of being a father” (since the newborn would force him to be financially supportive to the family as a man in the context of China). The five available responses were “do not agree, slightly agree, somewhat agree, mostly agree, completely agree”. We dichotomized these responses into do not agree, slightly agree, somewhat agree in one group, and mostly agree, completely agree in the other group.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to describe participants’ demographic characteristics, knowledge and beliefs about smoking, their partners’ smoking prevalence before, during and after pregnancy, and the percentage that had quit smoking. Chi-square tests were used for univariate comparisons and non-conditional logistical regression analysis was applied to identify demographic and socio-economic factors associated with quitting and relapse. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). All the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Version 19.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

All 832 post-natal mothers who attended the clinic for child vaccination were approached during the study period. Twenty-one of the total 832 women did not meet the eligibility criteria (two were under the age of 18 and nineteen had resided in Shanghai for less than one year). Forty-six females refused to participate for reasons including insufficient time available, concerns about information disclosure and lack of interest. Consequently, 765 women completed the questionnaire, with a response rate of 94.3%.

The average age of the women surveyed was 28.6 (SD = 3.1) years. Over half (56.4%) had a college degree. Compared with nonsmoking husbands, husbands who smoked were less likely to have an education beyond high school (P < 0.0001) or to hold a valid Shanghai residence (P < 0.0001), and more likely to have monthly income less than 5000 CNY (P < 0.0001, equivalent of 750 USD). No statistically significant differences were observed between male smokers and nonsmokers regarding age, study site or frequency of receiving counseling on quitting smoking during wives’ pregnancy (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of men’s smoking status reported by their wives

Characteristics

Nonsmokers (n = 403)

Smokers (n = 362)

P Value

No.

%

No.

%

 

Age (years)

 < 30

111

27.5

104

28.7

0.326

 30–35

230

57.1

199

54.9

 

 35+

62

15.4

59

16.2

 

Education

 Secondary School or Less

55

13.6

95

26.2

<0.0001

 High School Graduate

65

16.1

101

27.9

 

 College Graduate

160

39.7

112

30.9

 

 Above college

123

30.5

54

14.9

 

Residence

 Shanghai

207

51.4

134

37.0

<0.0001

 Non-Shanghai

196

48.6

228

63.0

 

Study site

 District 1

171

42.4

176

48.6

0.086

 District 2

232

57.6

186

51.4

 

Household income/M (CNY)ab

 < 5000

105

26.6

140

39.5

<0.0001

 5000–10000

119

30.1

121

34.2

 

 10000+

171

43.3

93

26.3

 

Counseling received during pregnancy

 Yes

286

71.0

249

68.8

0.511

 No

117

29.0

113

31.2

 

aHousehold income per month, 1 USD = 6.2 CNY

bMissing value = 16

Three hundred and sixty-two of the 765 respondents (47.32%) reported their husbands as current or ever smokers. The prevalence of husband smoking in one year before, during and at least three months after their wives’ pregnancy were 42.87% (328/765), 36.34% (n = 278/765) and 43.79% (n = 335/765) respectively. Of the male smokers the average number of cigarettes smoked per day at these three stages was 9.16, 7.22 and 8.48 respectively. During their wives’ pregnancy, a large proportion of the 328 smoking husbands altered their smoking behaviors: 15.24% (50/328) quit smoking, 29.88% (98/328) reduced the daily number of cigarettes smoked, and 45.12% (148/328) relocated to smoke when their wives were nearby. In contrast, only 8.54% (28/328) of the smoking husbands made no behavior change, whereas 1.22% (4/328) increased the number of cigarettes smoked. According to the age of infants, husbands were classified into three group: 3–6 months, 6–12months and 12–18months. Despite initial changes, however, smoking relapse happened at 75% (12/16), 50% (7/14) and 85% (17/20) of the husbands respectively. The average proportion of quitting was 78% and most of the relapses occurred in the first six months after delivery (Table 2).
Table 2

The proportion of smoking relapse in men by the age of child (Months)

Time after the birth of infant (months)

Proportion of relapse by the age of child

3–6

6–12

12–18

0–3

11

2

5

3–6

1

3

11

6–12

-

2

0

12–18

-

-

1

None

4

7

3

Total

16

14

20

Relapse Rate

75%

50%

85%

To those whose husband were smokers, 70% of the women reported that they had received counseling and/or information during pregnancy from doctors, co-workers, mass media and Internet but no significant association was found with the husbands’ quitting (P = 0.24). The top three reasons that women believe in hindering husband to quit smoking were tobacco addiction (52%), not knowing how to quit (50%) and social context (46%). Another 48% agreed that smoking causes addiction and therefore medical assistance is necessary.

Multivariate analysis was conducted to understand the association between individual and environmental factors and quitting smoking (Table 3). After adjusting for potential confounders, those who quit smoking during their wives’ pregnancy were more likely those who were occasional smokers (OR = 4.83, 95%CI [2.22, 10.48]), who had smoked less than ten years (OR = 2.80, 95%CI [1.19, 6.58]), who did not smoke at home (OR = 4.48, 95%CI [1.94, 10.39]), did not use cigarettes as a social tool (OR = 4.05, 95%CI [1.74, 9.41]), who did not report an enhanced financial pressure of being a father (OR = 5.28, 95%CI [2.14, 13.02]), and who were influenced by family members (OR = 2.82, 95%CI [1.25, 6.38]).
Table 3

Multivariate analysis for factors associated with spouses quitting during their wives pregnancy, China (n=328)

Factors

Quitting smoking

Adjusted ORa

P-value

Yes

No

(95%CI)

 

Age (years)

 < 30

13

82

1.00

0.653

 30–35

29

148

1.07 (0.44,2.58)

 

 35+

8

48

1.70 (0.51,5.63)

 

Education

 < =Secondary School

6

80

1.00

0.451

 High School

19

70

1.05 (0.23,4.76)

 

 College

17

87

1.94 (0.54,6.96)

 

 Above College

8

41

0.86 (0.27,2.71)

 

Income (CNY)

 < 5000

20

109

1.00

0.151

 5000–10000

12

97

0.40 (0.14,1.13)

 

 10000+

18

72

0.74 (0.27,2.55)

 

Residence

 Non-Shanghai

29

176

1.00

0.033

 Shanghai

21

102

2.76 (1.08,7.04)

 

Study site

 District 1

30

130

1.00

0.039

 District 2

20

148

2.24 (1.04,4.85)

 

Smoking status before pregnancy

 Daily smoker

15

220

1.00

<0.0001

 Occasional smoker

35

58

4.83 (2.22,10.48)

 

Smoking years

 ≥ 10

14

154

1.00

0.018

 < 10

36

124

2.80 (1.19, 6.58)

 

Smoking at home

 Yes

15

174

1.00

<0.0001

 No

35

104

4.48 (1.94,10.39)

 

Wife received education on harms of tobacco

 No

13

90

1.00

0.238

 Yes

37

188

1.68 (0.71,4.01)

 

Social use

 Yes

17

152

1.00

0.001

 No

33

126

4.05 (1.74,9.41)

 

Under financial pressure

 High

21

83

1.00

<0.0001

 Low

29

195

5.28 (2.14,13.02)

 

Perception of cigarette price

 Expensive

37

202

1.00

0.245

 Not expensive

13

76

1.70 (0.70,4.01)

 

Influenced by family membersb

 No

18

154

1.00

0.013

 Yes

32

124

2.82 (1.25,6.38)

 

aAdjusted for age, education, income, residence and study site

bThis includes persuading husband not to smoke, setting rules at home or asking husbands to smoke in a designated area

Discussion

Pregnancy offers a compelling opportunity for both pregnant women and their partners to quit smoking. Capitalizing on pregnancy as a teachable moment could serve as an effective tool for China to curb the tobacco epidemic and save thousands of lives. Nonetheless, this opportunity has been overlooked at least in part due to limited research and insufficient evidence supporting this approach. It is fortunate that prevalence of female smoking is rather low in China (2.4%), in comparison to the great prevalence in the male population (52.9%) [6].

This study mainly focused on partner/husband smoking. It provided descriptive information about married male smokers’ tobacco use before, during and after their wives’ pregnancy. We found the proportion of smoking husbands that smoked post-pregnancy was high (43.79%), in comparison to other low-and-middle-income countries [22], and that smoking husbands were more likely to be middle aged, less educated and at a lower social-economic status.

Spontaneous quitting, often recognized as the Cold Turkey method, is viewed as the least effective method with a success rate of only 4–7% [23]. However, results in this study indicate that even without cessation support (that is medication, behavior intervention and cessation counseling), pregnancy substantially increased (15.24%) husbands’ smoking cessation rate. At the same time, many of the husbands decided to cut down the number of cigarettes smoked per day (29.88%) or change their smoking location (45.12%), whereas less than one out of ten sustained smoking at the same amount (8.54%) or raised the number of cigarettes smoked (1.22%). According to a report from a randomized control trial, men’s cessation rate at the 6th month of pregnancy reached up to 16.5%, compared to 9.3% in a control group without any planned interventions [24]. This suggests the benefit of interventions that target male smokers during their wives’ pregnancy is considerable, especially on the basis of China’s enormous smoking population. In addition, more than two thirds of the female respondents in this study reported that they had received counseling and/or information during pregnancy from doctors, co-workers, mass media and Internet that suggested the creation of a smoke-free family at pregnancy. With convincing messages and evidence-based approaches from credible sources, pregnant women can be empowered and contribute collectively to improve husbands’ smoking behavior.

It is notable that a large proportion of male smokers choose to change their smoking location (45.12%), whereas they were unwilling to quit smoking or cut down cigarettes smoked. Second hand smoking during pregnancy is a risk factor for both the mother and the embryo. Abundant evidence indicated the correlation between nicotine exposure and multiple adverse outcomes as preterm delivery and stillbirth [25, 26]. Previous research has found that the main source of ETS exposure to women is their smoking husbands and other family members; and smoking males, especially fathers were encouraged to take precautions when a pregnant woman was nearby [19]. This slight movement of smoking outdoors rather than inside would largely reduce ETS exposure not only for the pregnant mother but also for the unborn infant [27]. Simultaneously, male smokers were encouraged to reconsider their tobacco use, concerning the health of their family members. Therefore, pregnancy offers a golden opportunity for effective interventions launched on maternal exposure to second hand smoking at pregnancy.

Perinatal abstinence from smoking is associated with both individual and environmental factors [2830]. Our study found that individual factors like occasional smokers, and not smoking at home increased quit rates. Environmental factors like non-social use, low financial pressure from having a new baby and presence of family intervention were also significantly associated with men’s quitting. Policies like mass media campaigns and bans on smoking in public places have also influenced the climate of social smoking. On the other hand, over two third of women received education on the harms of tobacco during pregnancy, but no significant association was found in our study regarding husbands’ quitting. As far as our understanding goes, such education does not provide direct intervention to smoking husbands, rather, a reminder of harms of smoking to pregnant women with no follow up instructions or supports. Meanwhile, most wives in this study were not sure if their husbands had received any kind of quitting assistance from practitioners or any other medical professional. In fact, although evidence-based interventions have already been proved to be effective, the methods themselves haven’t reached the majority of China’s population. Most significantly, wives usually don’t recognize nicotine addiction as a latent obstacle against their husbands’ quitting. Only 48% of women agreed with the notion that smoking causes addiction and requires medical assistance to help smokers to quit.

The main limitation of this study was the reliability of the wives’ reporting on behalf of their husbands. Additionally, the convenience sampling might have influenced the representativeness of the study population, and the cross-sectional design could have incurred potential recall bias, to some extent, as women were asked to recall their partners’ smoking habit at pregnancy. It is also very likely that women did not remember the exact number of cigarettes their husbands smoked per day before, during and after their pregnancy. Therefore we asked them to answer the approximate numbers such as 5, 10, 15 or 20. It is also possible that women were not sure how much their husband smoked at work or outside the home. However, a previous study conducted in China found that wives were able to correctly report their husbands’ smoking behavior [31]. Additionally, inclusion criteria only covered those women who lived with their husbands during pregnancy, one year before and at least three months after, thus increasing the likelihood that respondents could answer the full set of smoking questions.

Last but not least, four out of five quitters relapsed after the delivery. This indicates that smoking cessation at pregnancy might not be sustainable in the long run. However, this study is limited regarding the details. No information was collected on why spontaneous quitting at pregnancy was not enough to both radically and “permanently” change husbands’ smoking behavior, since only smokers abstinence of smoking for two years could be regarded as successful quitters [32]. One possibility was that pregnancy, which lasts for about ten months, does not provide a sufficient amount of time for husband to reconstruct their smoking behavior. This study’s findings suggested that professional supports for expectant fathers who have already initiated quitting smoking are urgently needed to stimulate and maintain the quitting progress.

Conclusion

Pregnancy is a neglected opportunity for Chinese men to quit smoking. A 15.24% quitting rate was observed in expectant fathers in this study, along with another 75% changing their smoking behavior in some way. However, cessation was followed by a 78% cumulative relapse after delivery. Tobacco control interventions during pregnancy should be tailored to meet the needs of both the husband and the wife. They should be individualized respectively for light and heavy smokers. Professional and societal supports should be offered to the new parents to sustain quitting. A tobacco-free environment could make remarkable impacts on men’s quitting smoking during their wives’ pregnancy.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by a Distinguished Professorship Award to the corresponding author granted by the China Medical Board [grant numbers G16916403] which supported design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data. And also Fudan University’s Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program from 2011 to 2012 [grant numbers (2012) S231] which supported data collection including transportation of investigators (university students) and questionnaire printing.

Availability of data and materials

Data can be shared upon research questions. Please contact the corresponding author at bxu@shmu.edu.cn.

Authors’ contributions

YH designed the study, collected the data, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. CX and SQ were involved in data collection and data analysis. XB was the advisor of the study involving in study design, data analysis and manuscript writing. ZPP and MK commented on the data and assisted with writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Public Health, Fudan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all eligible women before they answered the anonymous questionnaire in the community health centers.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health, Fudan University
(2)
Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety (Fudan University), Ministry of Education
(3)
University of Missouri, Kansas City
(4)
Health Communication Institute, Fudan University
(5)
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
(6)
Department of Public Health Science, Karolinska Institutet

References

  1. Yang G, Li Q, Hsia J. Prevalence of Smoking in China in 2010. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(25):2469–70. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1102459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang J, Ou J, Chun X. Tobacco smoking in China: Prevalence, disease burden, challenges and future strategies. Respirology. 2011;16(8):1165–72. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02062.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Samet JM. The health benefits of smoking cessation. Med Clin North Am. 1992;76(2):399–414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization. (2013) WHO Report on the global tobacco epidemic. Enforcing bans on tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.Google Scholar
  5. Kim SS, Chen W, Kolodziej M, et al. A Systematic Review of Smoking Cessation Intervention Studies in China. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(8):891–9. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr289.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. World Health Organization. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) China 2010 Country Report. http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/survey/gats/en/. Accessed 10 May 2015
  7. Jiang Y, Elton-Marshall T, Fong GT, et al. Quitting smoking in China: findings from the ITC China Survey. Tob Control. 2010;19(Supplement 2):i12–7. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.031179.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Pollak KI, Denman S, Gordon K, et al. Is pregnancy a teachable moment for smoking cessation among US Latino expectant fathers? A pilot study. Ethnic Health. 2010;15(1):47–59. doi:10.1080/13557850903398293.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Oien T, Storro O, Jenssen JA, et al. The impact of a minimal smoking cessation intervention for pregnant women and their partners on perinatal smoking behaviour in primary health care: a real-life controlled study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:325. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-325.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pineles BL, Park E, Samet JM. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Miscarriage and Maternal Exposure to Tobacco Smoke During Pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(7):807–23. doi:10.1093/aje/kwt334.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hesketh T, Lu L, Jun Y, et al. Smoking, cessation and expenditure in low income Chinese: cross sectional survey. BMC Pubilc Health. 2007;14(8):891–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-29.Google Scholar
  12. Winickoff JP, Healey EA, Regan S, et al. Using the postpartum hospital stay to address mothers’ and fathers’ smoking: the NEWS study. Pediatrics. 2010;125(3):518–25. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bottorff JL, Radsma J, Kelly M, et al. Fathers’ narratives of reducing and quitting smoking. Sociol Health Illn. 2009;31(2):185–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01126.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Melvin C, Gaffney C. Treating nicotine use and dependence of pregnant and parenting smokers: An update. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6:107–24. doi:10.1080/14622200410001669231.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ranby KW, Lewis MA, Toll BA, et al. Perceptions of Smoking-Related Risk and Worry Among Dual-Smoker Couples. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(3):734–8. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hemsing N, Greaves L, O’Leary R, et al. Partner Support for Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(7):767–76. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr278.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic China. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/pcsj/. Accessed 20 Sept 2015
  18. Loke AY, Mak YW, Lau PY. Predictors of Spontaneous Smoking Cessation Among Chinese Men Whose Wives are Pregnant. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(6):1247–56. doi:10.1007/s10995-011-0884-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fu C, Chen Y, Wang T, et al. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in Chinese new mothers decreased during pregnancy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(11):1182–6. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Planning. Shanghai annual health planning report. Shanghai, China. http://www.wsjsw.gov.cn/wsj/n2006/n4137/n4148/index.html. Accessed 12 Sept 2016.
  21. Qian J, Cai M, Gao J, et al. Trends in smoking and quitting in China from 1993 to 2003: National Health Service Survey data. B World Health Organ. 2010;88(10):769–76. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.064709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. World Health Organization. Global Adult Tobacco Survey. http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/gats/en/. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  23. American Cancer Society. Guide to Quitting Smoking: A word about success rates for quitting smoking. http://www.cancer.org/healthy/stayawayfromtobacco/guidetoquittingsmoking/guide-to-quitting-smoking-success-rates. Accessed 6 May 2015
  24. Stanton W. Randomised control trial of a smoking cessation intervention directed at men whose partners are pregnant. Prev Med. 2004;38(1):6–9. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General, 2014. http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/. Accessed 8 June 2015
  26. Dior UP, Lawrence GM, Sitlani C, et al. Parental smoking during pregnancy and offspring cardio-metabolic risk factors at ages 17 and 32. Atherosclerosis. 2014;235(2):430–7. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.05.937.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee J, Lee DR, Lee DH, et al. Influence of maternal environmental tobacco smoke exposure assessed by hair nicotine levels on birth weight. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(7):3029–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaneko A, Kaneita Y, Yokoyama E, et al. Smoking trends before, during, and after pregnancy among women and their spouses. Pediatr Int. 2008;50(3):367–75. doi:10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02582.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Everett KD, Bullock L, Longo DR, et al. Men’s Tobacco and Alcohol Use During and After Pregnancy. Am J Mens Health. 2007;1(4):317–25. doi:10.1177/1557988307299477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Bottorff JL, Oliffe J, Kalaw C, et al. Men’s constructions of smoking in the context of women’s tobacco reduction during pregnancy and postpartum. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(12):3096–108. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. He Y, Lam TH, Li LS, et al. Passive smoking at work as a risk factor for coronary heart disease in Chinese women who have never smoked. BMJ. 1994;308:308–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6925.380.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Gilpin EA, Pierce JP, Farkas AJ. Duration of smoking abstinence and success in quitting. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(8):572. doi:10.1093/jnci/89.8.572.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement